N.S. Martorana, L. Acosta, M.V. Andrés, G. Cardella, F. Catara, E. De Filippo, S. De Luca, D. Dell'Aquila, B. Gnoffo, E.G. Lanza, G. Lanzalone, I. Lombardo, C. Maiolino, S. Norella, A. Pagano, E.V. Pagano, M. Papa, S. Pirrone, G. Politi, F. Porto, L. Quattrocchi, F. Rizzo, P. Russotto, A. Trifirò, M. Trimarchi, M. Vigilante, A. Vitturi
Recently, much relevance has been given to the collective states in neutron-rich nuclei. The remarkable interest in these states is driven by the presence of an electric dipole response around the nucleon binding energy [1,2]. This mode, the so called Pygmy Dipole Resonance (PDR), although is carrying few per cent of the isovector Energy Weighted Sum Rule (EWSR) has a strong relation with the symmetry energy and it has been used as a further tool to constrain it. It is predicted to be present in almost all nuclei with neutron excess: in particular for nuclei far from the stability line. This mode can be populated by both isoscalar and isovector probes due to the properties of its transition densities [3]. Several experiments, with both the probes, have been performed on stable nuclei [1,2,4,5]. Whereas, the study of the PDR with unstable nuclei has been done in pioneering experiments carried out at the GSI, using relativistic Coulomb excitations on 132Sn [6] and 68Ni [7] isotopes.
We use, for the first time, an isoscalar probe to excite the PDR on an unstable isotope. The experiment with a 68Ni beam at 33 MeV/nucleon on a 12C target was performed at LNS-INFN of Catania. The unstable beam was produced by In Flight Fragmentation method in a dedicated In Fligth Radioactive Ion Beams (FRIBs) transport line. The detector systems CHIMERA [8] and Farcos [9] were used to detect both gamma and charged products.
References:
[1] D. Savran, T. Aumann and A. Zilges, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 70, 210 (2013).
[2] A. Bracco, F.C. L. Crespi, and E. G. Lanza, Eur. Phys. J. A 51 (2015).
[3] E. G. Lanza, A. Vitturi, M. V. Andrés, F. Catara and D. Gambacurta, Phys. Rev. C 84, 064602 (2011).
[4] D. Savran et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 232501 (2008).
[5] J. Endres et al, Phys. Rev. C 80, 034302 (2009).
[6] P. Adrich et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 132501 (2005).
[7] O. Wieland et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 092502 (2009).
[8] A.Pagano et al Nucl. Phys. A 734 (2004) 504.
[9] E.V. Pagano et al, EPJ Web of Conferences 117, 10008 (2016).