Minutes for LArSoft coordination meeting on May 21, 2019
Present | Lynn Garren, Krzysztof Genser,Robert Hatcher, Alex Himmel, Kyle Knoepfel, Saba Sehrish, Erica Snider, Hans Wenzel|
Remote | Katherine Lato |
Release and Project status report [Erica Snider]
- 08_20_00 updates to pandora, bug fixes, improvement to OpDet
- this week, ifdhc update
- recob::Vertex fix is already in develop
- migration to Python 3
- means dropping slf6
- We need to know if it is supported by experiments, and in what timeframe?
- LArIAT has alot of Python scripts, who is going to update those. Its experiments’ responsibility.
- Infrastructure things are already in Python 3, FIFE is pushing for end of summer migration
- project.py in LArbatch
- nutools refactoring
- version tightly coupled with specific versions of Geant4, Genie,
- re-factor into separate components
- plan is to have a proposal in the next LCM
- dedicated discussion on Thursday
Conclusion
- Need to know from experiments about migration to Python 3
- end of life for Python 2 in January so we should try no later than end of summer deadline
Survey of module and service usage across LArSoft [Kyle Knoepfel]
New features and interface changes [Gianluca Petrillo]
- In Geant4 wire plane is a box and has thickness, it has wires that are cylinders
- 2 or 3 wire planes are adjacent to the others
- if you ask for the position of wires, LArG4 voxel readout was returning the center
- geo::TPCGeo::PlaneLocation() reports the center of the box
- where wires are not in the center, in case of Argoneut the wires were on the side
- consider geo::TPCGeo::PlaneLocation() deprecated; there are better options:
- geo::PlaneGeo::GetCenter(): less fragile
- geo::TPCGeo::DistanceToReferencePlane(), geo::PlaneGeo::DriftPoint(),
- geo::PlaneGeo::DistanceFromPlane(): drift-direction aware
- Request to officially deprecate it
- does it make sense right now? provide feature branches with deprecation
- discussion to clear out the different concepts in readout, simulation etc
-
comment on if utilities are not widely used across all the experiments, then they should not be added to LArSoft
- Comment by Krzysztof Genser on naming conventions that LArSoft should have one.
-
Geant4 has the naming convention to use G4, so other projects should not use classes named that way. G4Helper e.g. in nutools