1. Low energy machine. We've purchased SIMION, Jimmy Garland has
started learning it, and we intend to do tracking of Carol's design
and characterise. Roger and I bid for money last week to fund some
work on it, but we weren't successful, but we may be able to bid for
more soon. Roger can say what's intended at Huddersfield.

2. Therapy machine. There is some interest over here in a normal
conducting follow-up to PAMELA that allows pCT. Chris Edmonds and I
have been discussing possible designs, and Chris has laid out a couple
in Zgoubi. The primary question we should address there is whether we
want fast energy variation of the therapy beam or not.

3. 1 GeV machine. As you know we've been looking at the induction
option, but it doesn't look very attractive. So Carol's design is the
one to look at for now! However, we should contrast the different
solutions - nsFFAG, H2+, and SOC.

Also, David Brett (Rob's student) has nearly finished a mapping code
that will be useful for doing FFAG tracking. You just give it a field
map. My student James Jones is presently looking at racetrack FFAGs.

One specific outcome I think we should from the meeting, or shortly
after, is a parameter sheet for each of the machines. This parameter
sheet should have 'target', 'achieved in design', and 'presently
achieved' values for each of the following parameters:

Particle type accelerated
Energy
Circumference
Max field (and whether SC or NC)
Lattice structure/number of cells/magnet layout
Beam current/bunch structure/repetition rate
Time of flight (plus whether isochronous)
RF acceleration voltage
Aperture/radius range
Dynamic aperture
Injection/extraction method

I can guess at these numbers, but we should have a table for each
machine that gets updated as designs progress. An ideal thing to put
on Pavel's Google page.