There has been tremendous progress on DUNE over the past few years,
driven by a very dedicated collaboration.  Over the next few years, DUNE will be
going through at least two important transitions.  The first will be triggered
by decisions made in the US ``P5'' process.  While the US SNOWMASS process 
recommends the most important directions for the next several years, P5 
sets priorities---and therefore, funding and schedules---for all of the US HEP.
We must ensure that we make a convincing case that our full Phase II physics
program, including additional detector mass, upgraded beam, and near detector
suite, is a compelling high-priority program that must move forward as quickly
as possible.  Success here will require us to reiterate our precision
capabilities for DUNE's primary physics, and also point out that the
once-in-lifetime investment in neutrino physics that has already begun can
leverage an even broader scope of science---turning LBNF/DUNE into a
world-leading place to explore the rich array of physics available in our field.

	The second transition will happen if we maintain, and hopefully advance,
our current Phase I schedule.  Just think: graduate students recruited in the
next two or three years will actually see neutrino data from DUNE itself.  We
will thus start changing from a project, to an experiment.  We must go beyond
our sensitivity studies and tool development and begin thinking how we will RUN
the DUNE experiment, and how we will extract physics.  We will  need to take
lessons learned from ProtoDUNE analyses---and those of the short-baseline
program---to ensure we will be ready on Day 0 to start producing precision
physics.  

	And we need to do all of this while insisting that our collaboration
move forward on our shared goal of diversity along all the axes on which we have
done poorly historically. We should explore ways in which we can better involve
minority-serving institutions in our work, for example, by involving students 
even now when we are heavy with project engineering.  We also need
to strengthen the inclusivity of our collaboration by always being clear that
the DUNE Collaboration conducts itself with mutual respect for everyone.

	Priorities over the next few years are therefore:

o  Ensure we maintain or advance the Phase I schedule.  Doing this may require
creativity, and it may require hard choices, but as DUNE data peeks above the
horizon, it will catalyze a resurgence of scientific effort from across the
collaboration.

o  Succeed in convincing P5 that all of Phase II is critical to our program and
to the field as a whole, and that it must move forward as quickly as possible.
We should include an argument that a broad program is possible at LBNF/DUNE, and
that goal will inform our choices of technology for Modules 3 and 4.

o  Broaden participation in DUNE, particularly from under-represented and
marginalized groups, and ensure that we maintain a respectful environment for
everyone.

o   Take the lessons learned from ProtoDUNE and other LArTPC data analyses, to
streamline our own approaches.  We need to be ready with a plan for getting
physics from DUNE on timescales much shorter than what our community has done
to date.