Reviewers are asked to consider the 1-5 year time frame for the Gratia project to:
¨Understand and comment on the scope, status and plans.
¨Comment on the priorities and appropriateness of the pending requests, requirements and planned evolutions.
¨Offer advice and guidance to the management and sponsors of the project on their continued support.
¨Recommend whether the current approach, and technologies, are still warranted.
¨Advise whether and/or when the project should look into whether there exists any new implementations out that we could adopt and maintain effectively (with fewer resources in the longer term).
¨Suggest areas of investigation and work that would enhance the value of the project.
MOU between FNAL and UNL for the support of Gratia
OSG FNAL SOW 2012
Reviewers Report
09:00
→
09:45
Questions for Reviewers, Strategy, Goals, Background
Convener:
Ruth Pordes
(Fermilab)
slides
09:45
→
10:30
Architecture, Functionality, Status, Future Needs
Convener:
MrsTanya Levshina
(Fermilab)
slides
10:30
→
11:00
Stakeholder Statements
US ATLAS - Michael Ernst (remote)
US CMS - Burt Holzman
FermiLab - Keith Chadwick
OSG User Support - Chander Sehgal (in absentia)
OSG Executive Team - Lothar Bauerdick
UNL - David Swanson
Fermilab
HCC
OSG Executive Director
OSG User Support
US ATLAS Presentation
US CMS presentation
11:00
→
12:00
Discussion
12:00
→
13:00
Lunch
1h
13:00
→
15:00
Discussion and Writing of Report
Reviewers, Caller of the Review (Steve Wolbers) and others the reviewers request attend