Please read these instructions before posting any event on Fermilab Indico

Indico will be unavailable on Wed, Jan 15th from 7-7:30am CST due to server maintenance.

Fermilab / UChicago Electron-Lens Meeting

US/Central
    • 14:00 14:20
      General Updates 20m
      • MaryKate is focusing on analyzing data from the NIOLD experiment. She met with Giulio last week on finishing the electron gun design report.
      • Sergei K. will work with Nilanjan on writing a report on the Cyclotron Emission Monitor. Here's the suggested outline:
        • Motivation for the monitor. What can it measure and how is it useful?
        • Past attempts at building such an instrument including what has been done in other fields. What do we have now?
        • Range of parameters relevant to our implementation, including a demonstration at the test stand and also a device at IOTA.
        • Proposal for the structure of the device.
        • A rough evaluation of the costs and timeline to build this device.
      • John is working on uploading all the required documents to run the bidding process.
      • We will skip the next 2 meetings, and meet again on January 3, 2024.
    • 14:20 15:00
      Proton parameter calculations for an ensemble of lattices 40m
      Speaker: Nilanjan Banerjee (Fermilab)
      • While the IBS module in MAD-X does not support linear transverse coupling, a few years back Sergei and Valeri wrote a paper on IBS calculations including transverse coupling. See https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.09275 Does any code implement this?
      • The terminology for Residual Gas Scattering should be: single vs multiple scattering.
      • The design of the lattice and the optimization scheme should be documented. The spread of values of various growth rates and dynamics is a result of the wide landscape of lattices for electron cooling studies and does not represent a confidence interval on the expected values.
      • How do the emittance growth rates vary for different beam parameters such as energy and emittances?
      • A different approach would be to fix a lattice and beam parameters and then introduce other sources of uncertainty, such as lattice errors. This might be an useful method to analyze fixed lattices such as the NIO lattice.
      • Is there a way to get quick estimates of the emittance growth rates before going into detailed calculations with different lattices?